You are here: Home > Movies TV > Choosing 3D Movies or 2D Movies

Choosing 3D Movies or 2D Movies

 

Choosing 3D Movies or 2D Movies - 3D films are currently in your local movie theater with a rate which is endemic. After a while, you can probably help but ask, “Can all these films are worth the extra money I pay to the fund,” Well, I will open a third dimension of this issue.

First, only a few films actually shot in 3D. ”Avatar” restarted 3D hype, there is not only a pioneer in high-tech special effects, but it was with the new 3D system by the director, James Cameron has created photographed. Mainly composed of the platform, he helped design a special high-definition camera mounted on the configuration in which the camera is usually shoots and shoots other through a mirror so that the camera close enough to each other to simulate the distance between human eyes. As a result, the film looks spectacular, and in true 3D.

Second, most of the “3D movies” real 2D other, “normal”, the film, which is then converted into a post. “Clash of the Titans” remake of 2010 is the perfect example. They shot the film, whichis usually only one camera at a time when the final image flat. Then they took the film to go to other artists and the time per frame and separate the elements in each plane to simulate 3D. They are cut as someone who is in the foreground, and behind them on the bottom for them. You will be assigned to the person a little more to the left is an image, then a little further to the right of other images. What it behind the hole? They are more of a background image fill the gaps that exist extend through the cutting of people who live there.

Third, whatever the end result is to convert it? It seems fair, but the effect tends to be people in every shot like cardboard cut face, the look in your area from the rest of the background. This does not seem quite as real as if they actually photographed by the 3D camera.

Finally, what do you mean by this 3D now? I remember in 80 when I made in 3D and the impact from it. Frankly, I think the 3D is better than the objects on the screen is much better than the current 3D. Of course, it was done with a movie projector and then, but somehow the effect is better. Today 3D is really much better to convey a sense of depth that you can get in the picture.Some things are just visible coming for you, but keep in mind that 3D is only promised to make things seem separated from each other, not necessarily jumps to you.

Why convert a movie studio? It’s simple: money. It is very expensive to shoot in 3D. But after the conversion film is saving money. Personally, if I have to pay for 3D movies, I prefer something really shot to pay. The filmmakers go on this way and the way to their vision. If you are not sure how the movie was filmed, only a little research online for you and you will discover the truth behind it.

No related posts.

Tags: , ,

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Leave a Reply