You are here: Home > Movies TV > Movie Review: Puss in Boots (2011)

Movie Review: Puss in Boots (2011)

The notorious outlaw Puss in Boots (Antonio Banderas), also called the Gingerhead Man, Chupacabra, the Furry Lover and Frisky Two Times, wasn’t always a legend – he had humble origins at a poor orphanage in San Ricardo. It was there that he was taken in by the kindhearted, motherly Imelda (Constance Marie) and befriended by Humpty Alexander Dumpty (Zach Galifianakis), a ahead-considering, ingenious dreamer with wild ideas of finding magical beans that could raise an unlimited beanstalk to transport them to the castle of a giant. Awaiting them would be peril, glory, and a golden goose that lays stable gold eggs. Their childhood quest was fruitless, nevertheless, and as an alternative they each started down a path of petty thievery – till a tragic night separated them for greater than a decade.

In the course of the Pageant of the Hearth celebration, Puss in Boots is approached by Kitty Softpaws (Salma Hayek), a highly expert burglar, swordswoman, dancer and seducer, to assist within the restoration of the genuine magic beans. Her boss is Humpty Dumpty, and although Puss reluctantly agrees to hitch the group, he refuses to forgive the outsized egg for the previous occasions that break up them up. Step one of their plan is to accumulate the glowing inexperienced legumes from the repugnant duo Jack (Billy Bob Thornton) and Jill (Amy Sedaris), which could possibly be so harmful they might not be capable to proceed further.

You’d suppose that Puss’ clunky boots would intervene together with his capability to at all times land on his feet, scale buildings, and interact in all kinds of swashbuckling actions, but instead they seem to be a important part of the visual comedy and character design that makes the film such a placing work. There are additionally plenty of cute cat jokes and gags that distinction Puss’ ferociousness with his diminutive body and preference for gently lapping leche with his tiny tongue (along along with his signature eye-swelling, hypnotic negotiating). A very humorous dance combat, impressed modifying to imitate stay motion film-making, Dumpty’s hilariously awkward image and background cats with strange voices (“Ohhh Cat” by Robert Persichetti Jr. being the best) are all elements that showcase the creators’ intelligent artistry.

The laughs are mostly derived from situational comedy that makes Puss in Boots more common than Shrek’s pop-culture-heavy referential skits. The script edges in grownup content too, subtly hinting at sexual innuendo, inappropriate tattoos, medication, egg genitalia and nudity (utterly inconspicuous to kids), as well as darker themes of betrayal, imprisonment and death. However its overt adorableness subdues any negativity. The animation itself is of a superlative quality and the extent of fast-paced motion is superior to the last couple of Shrek sequels, with awe-inspiring visuals, complicated stunts and truly suspenseful adventure, neatly utilizing a supporting role that never as soon as hinted on the irritating nature of Donkey. Puss in Boots undoubtedly deserved a film of his own and the shortage of Shrek would not diminish the leisure worth in the least.

Incoming search terms:

No related posts.

Tags: , , ,

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Leave a Reply